To: Advertising Standards Authority, MHRA, NHS, Rochdale Council, Chris Clarkson MP, Rochdale Health Alliance

Dear Sir or Madam

‘VACCINES’ MEDICAL MISINFORMATION ADVERTISEMENT IN ROCHDALE TOWN CENTRE

I am writing with complaint at the ‘vaccine’ advertisements clearly promoting medical misinformation promoted by Dr Mo Jiva, Rochdale Council, and the NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale Clinical Commissioning Group. I saw only three of the same advertisement, which is attached, at the top of John Street traffic lights, Rochdale, facing walking pedestrians, on a standing banner at the top left of Yorkshire Street, again facing as people are walking from the traffic lights at John Street down Yorkshire Street, and on the standing banner outside The Cooperative Bank / Nationwide Building Society on Yorkshire Street, Rochdale. There is likely to be more surrounding the town centre. What is also worrying about the link www.rochdale.gov.uk./covidvaccine is that it doesn’t even provide a link to the MHRA vaccine adverse reactions.

Here It is, if this information is new to you. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting#annex-1-vaccine-analysis-print

Why is the advert giving clear medical misinformation?

The advert clearly states, ‘Getting vaccinated protects you, your family, friends and community’.

  1. These ‘vaccines’ have only temporary use authorisation through a ‘pandemic’ or state emergency, but clearly the data from the Office of National Statistics shows that there is no pandemic. Excess deaths were genocidal deaths caused through the lockdowns and the PCR test relies on an amplification cycle of 45, which could find anything and is not a reliable test to detect infection. A case does not mean an infection, so even the COVID-19 deaths data covering 2020 / 2021 is suspect. The WHO amended the definition of what a pandemic is in 2009 as just a disease that spreads worldwide. Prior to this it was a disease spreading worldwide causing mass deaths. As these ‘vaccines do not have full approval from the relevant bodies, it makes these ‘vaccines’ experimental and The Nuremberg Code 1947 states that providing all relevant data and information is essential in order to obtain full voluntary consent from the human subject PRIOR to taking part in the experiment.

There is no public health emergency, there is only the disguise of a public health emergency ‘pandemic’  being propagated through the mainstream media. It has been a PCR pandemic fraud from the start, together with the way deaths were reported too.

The truth is that cheap effective treatments for COVID-19 have been suppressed in favour of the vaccine agenda. https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/files/review-of-the-emerging-evidence-demonstrating-the-efficacy-of-ivermectin-in-the-prophylaxis-and-treatment-of-covid-19 and https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/zelenko-treatment-protocol/ and https://www.e-bmc.co.uk/ and https://www.palmerfoundation.com.au/hydroxychloroquine-and-the-burden-of-proof/. Clearly the WHO have its paid sponsors who desire the vaccine agenda, so thousands of people have died unnecessarily and this is purposeful genocide.

https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1448.1.  Clearly NHS protocols are being ignored, which may result in further genocide if these vaccines prove unsafe in the coming months and all those ‘following orders’ are culpable.

Green Book Chapter 2

Consent must be obtained before starting any treatment or physical investigation or before providing personal care for a patient. This includes the administration of all vaccines. The guidance in this chapter is based both on the current legal position and the standards expected of health professionals by their regulatory bodies. The individual must be informed about the process, benefits and risks of immunisation and be able to communicate their decision. Information given should be relevant to the individual patient, properly explained and questions should be answered fully.

WHAT INFORMATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED

Individuals, or those giving consent on their behalf, must be given enough information to enable them to make a decision before they can give consent. This should include information about the process, benefits and risks of the immunisation(s).

The four UK countries provide a wide range of information, including leaflets, posters, videos, information packs, factsheets, and websites to support all aspects of the immunisation programme. This information is based on the current scientific evidence and clinical advice and will have been tested on relevant population groups.

Written or verbal information should be available in a form that can be easily understood by the individual who will be giving the consent. Where English is not the first language, translations and properly recognised interpreters should be used.

Consent is valid if the individual, or person providing consent, is offered as much information as they reasonably need to make their decision, and in a form that they can understand. Case law on this area is evolving – more detail can be found at www.dh.gov.uk/consent (strangely this link has now disappeared).

Health professionals should ensure that the individual (or those giving consent on their behalf) fully understands which immunisation(s) are to be administered; the disease(s) against which they will protect; the risks of not proceeding; the side effects that may occur and how these should be dealt with; and any follow-up action required.

Page 28 of COVID-19 vaccination programme, information for healthcare practitioners states

When working to some or all of the protocol, registered healthcare workers are responsible and accountable for their practice. They are accountable to their regulatory body and to their employer. When administering vaccines under the protocol, non-registered healthcare workers are accountable to their employer. Their employer is responsible for ensuring they are suitably trained, have completed the necessary competency assessment and are provided with an appropriate level of supervision when carrying out their duties under the protocol.

2. These ‘vaccines’ are not traditional vaccines containing a small dose of the virus to promote an immune response in the human body, so people are not being informed properly about what these ‘vaccines’ are, and what they do inside the body? According to Consultation Document: Changes to Human Health to Support the Rollout of COVID-19 Vaccines, these ‘vaccines’ are biotechnological medicines. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/consultation-document-changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines. What exactly are these and do you not believe that it is important to explain this to the millions of people have already been vaccinated, and who have yet to be vaccinated? Why mislead the public into calling them vaccines when they are not traditional vaccines?

3. This advertisement provides no clear data on the vaccine adverse reactions, which stand at over 780,000 as of 6 May 2021 and over 1100 deaths, via the MHRA Yellow Card data sheets. It is also estimated that only ten percent of adverse reactions are reported, which makes the realistic number of vaccine adverse reactions and deaths far higher. Suppression of this URGENT data is being denied to the public, which is medical misinformation and fraud. There is no long-term safety data on any of these vaccines.

4. Why has it got to be about the ‘vaccines’ as the only treatment? It’s because the WHO need to give their sponsors what they want. It’s never been about saving lives, but effective ways to reduce the population. Why not encourage walking, exercise, healthy eating including saturated fats like butter and coconut oil, Vitamin C, Zinc, Vitamin D3, and Vitamin B12?

I would far greater prefer that council tax monies go toward advertisements that encourage human beings to boost their own immune systems and not rely on pharmaceuticals, but instead fear is the promoter of the ‘vaccine‘ rollouts and is it fair that upon long term drug adverse reactions the vaccine manufacturer is fully immune from liability, and instead the taxpayer has to pay? Why not promote the truth that religion cannot save anyone and only Jesus Christ is the Saviour of mankind? Now that would be joyous to see, but scripture says that human wisdom will eventually prove its foolishness, and you will be harming people in the process by use of these false and medical misinformation advertisements. Children are families are starving worldwide and all you care about is pushing an experimental vaccine that is harming people every day. It’s morally wrong.

Contrary to what you state as promoted by Dr Mo Jiva, Rochdale Council, and the NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale Clinical Commissioning Group, I found the advertisement to be medically misinforming as there are clear NHS protocols that are not being followed and I pray that the Lord Jesus will intervene and expose these worldwide lies and fraud and hold all those consenting to this genocide to account in this lifetime.

It is clear that ALL data and information is not being provided to the public in order for them to make a full and voluntary informed consent about these experimental ‘vaccines’, as they only have temporary use. I am sure if you told the truth some people would still put themselves at risk by receiving the ‘vaccines’, but you would not dare tell people that it’s a social cleansing operation under Agenda 2030 and its orders of the United Nations and other non-governmental organisations.

£1.6 billion of public monies have gone into maintaining the narrative and real science has been censored. There were cheap effective treatments for COVID-19 used by thousands of doctors worldwide that have been censored and slandered to push the ‘vaccines’ narrative within this biggest COVID-19 religious cult through the use of applied psychology. The only other realistic reason to push the ‘vaccines’ is the financial incentives provided to maintain the narrative that there is a pandemic.

As a Christian, it is my duty to expose evil and I know that the enemy of all mankind is Satan who comes to steal, kill, and destroy. What you are involved in is not morally good or right. May the Lord have mercy on your soul for agreeing with this depopulation agenda and helping it function. Do not let the devil steal your conscience and soul. Seek the Lord today and he will save you. https://youtu.be/0CeGx2kvX5Y

Yours faithfully,

 

Helen

  1. Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) enquiries@asa.org.uk
  2. Rochdale Council CEO, chief.executive@rochdale.gov.uk
  3. June Raine MHRA CEO June.raine@mhra.gov.uk and advertising@mhra.gov.uk.
  4. Sir Simon Stevens NHS CEO, England.ce@nhs.net
  5. Chris Clarkson MP, chris.clarkson.mp@parliament.uk
  6. Dr Mo Jiva, Rochdale Health Alliance lgmch.communications.rha@nhs.net

 

 

 

2 Comments

  1. This is their response:

    Thank you for this referral. We have considered carefully the examples you provide of materials disseminated in Rochdale on COVID 19 vaccination.

    The MHRA is responsible, on behalf of Health Ministers, for administering the legislation on advertising medicines as set out in Part 14 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012, as amended. The relevant definition of an advertisement for a medicine is given in regulation 7. It is the view of the MHRA that materials disseminated by Government bodies in support of a public health campaign are not caught by this definition as they are not ‘designed to promote the prescription, supply, sale or use’ of a specific medicine or medicines. Their purpose is rather to promote public health by encouraging people to seek appropriate medical intervention, in this case uptake of vaccination against COVID 19. The regulations provide a specific exemption for an advertisement that may be issued as part of a campaign approved by Ministers (see regulations 292 and 291A). It was not considered necessary in the legislation to provide an exception for the whole campaign, only to provide a route for materials on specific medicines to be disseminated if Ministers considered it appropriate.

    We therefore consider that the materials you submitted fall outside our remit. If you disagree and have further evidence that this is not the case, please provide this evidence and we will consider again.

    I hope this is helpful.

    Kind regards,

    Ella
    MHRA Customer Service Centre
    Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU
    Telephone 0203 080 6000

  2. Dear Helen,

    Thank you for your email about our local covid-19 vaccination campaign.

    All of our materials are produced in line with national campaign messages and despite your obvious concerns we are confident that there has been no breach of advertising regulations.

    I note from your email that you have also contacted the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which is the correct organisation for dealing with complaints about advertising. If the ASA does make any recommendations in connection with your complaint the council and its partners will be only too happy to give them their full consideration.

    Thank you and best wishes,

     

    Danny Brierley
    Head of Communications

    Communications

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *