COVID-19 vaccines are cell and gene therapy. FACT. Straight out of the horses mouth, that horse is Bayer executive Stefan Oelrich.

Stefan Oelrich  00:00

I think this is really important also for these latitudes here. And for us, therefore, we’re really taking that leap, us as a company Bayer, in cell and gene therapy, which to me is one of these examples where really we’re going to make a difference hopefully moving forward. There’s some ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed two years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate. I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to do innovation in the way that was maybe not possible before.

To those of you who have received these ‘vaccines’? Were you told that the COVID-19 vaccines are cell and gene therapy? Do you know what it is going to do to your body? Does it provide immunity? Does it stop COVID transmission? Are you going to let them get away with lying to you?My friend was forced with section if she did not take the second shot. This is the letter we put together and they backed off.

Failing to inform you of the full facts of what you are TAKING in that COVID-19 is cell and gene therapy, and now this spike protein therapy has been injected into your body without knowing how it will affect you long term, or in years to come, is a breach of the Nuremberg Code 1947. Hold these people responsible and detox and help yourself.

Malfeasance, Misfeasance, Nonfeasance

Malfeasance definition

  • 1) law Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official that causes damage.
  • 2) wrongdoing
  • 3) Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official.
  • 4) (Law) The doing of an act which a person ought not to do; evil conduct; an illegal deed.
  • 5) wrongful conduct by a public official
  • 6) Evil-doing; the doing of that which ought not to be done; wrongful conduct, especially official misconduct; violation of a public trust or obligation; specifically, the doing of an act which is positively unlawful or wrongful, in contradistinction to misfeasance, or the doing of a lawful act in a wrongful manner. The term is often inappropriately used instead of misfeasance.

Misfeasance definition

  • 1) A wrong that arises from an action. The wrong can be actual or alleged. This word is often used in law, relating to the wrongful use of legal authority.
  • 2) Improper and unlawful execution of an act that in itself is lawful and proper.
  • 3) (Law) A trespass; a wrong arising from an overt act; the improper doing of an act which a person might lawfully do.
  • 4) doing a proper act in a wrongful or injurious manner
  • 5) In modern use, more specifically, the misuse of power; misbehavior in office; the wrongful and injurious exercise of lawful authority, as distinguished from malfeasance and nonfeasance. This word is often carelessly used in the sense of malfeasance.
  • 6) In law: A trespass; a wrong done

Nonfeasance definition

  • 1) law The intentional failure to perform an official duty or legal requirement.
  • 2) law The lack of liability associated with the failure to act.
  • 3) Failure to perform an act that is an official, contractual, or professional duty.

From my understanding of what has gone on these past twenty months, the fear propaganda agenda and now religious covid cult where much of the population just cannot face the fact that our leaders have lied and harmed them, Stockholm syndrome or cognitive dissonance, I would say that officials like Boris Johnson, Sajid Javid, Amanda Pritchard, Nadhim Zawali, Joe Biden, and these absolutely terrible tyrannical power-hungry leaders in Canada, Victoria, and New Zealand, they are guilty of malfeasance in that they have used fear to manipulate the numbers, suppressed effective medications that CURE Covid-19, and continue to lie and abuse their power when these people must serve the people, rather than it be the other way round. They have failed to state that COVID-19 vaccines are cell and gene therapy and purposely mislead the public through fear tactics that are criminal. I am of the opinion that they know what they are doing, and if any of these traitors want to sue me for defamation they will have to prove that what I say is wrong. The evidence is piling up against these LIARS. No one had to die. The rollout continues even though they blind to the official statistics of the vaccine adverse reactions, and now want to jab your children. Is this normal behaviour to save an NHS that is bribing its staff to take something that could possibly kill them? Why should anybody have to make such a decision? It is immoral. It is criminal. These leaders need to be in prison, in my opinion. they are GUILTY of malfeasance in public office. They have no remorse, it’s all about the jab, booster, jab, booster.  Where are you God-fearing judges? Have they bought you all? All those who were in previous positions like the existing NHS England chief executive and the hypocrite Matt Hancock, you are guilty too of lying to the public in ‘forgetting’ to tell the public that COVID-19 vaccines are cell and gene therapy.

These criminals know that those who are injured by these ‘vaccines’ have no justice in court, as the pharmaceutical companies are fully immune from liability. Bill Gates doesn’t care as long as he’s immune and making his 200 percent return investment in vaccines. Open your eyes. Millions of people have taken this experimental jab, and people are still lining up for this fake saviour. The spell upon mankind is overwhelming.

Now let’s get onto the GPs, the nurses, jabbers, and whosever else. What about the churches and doctors who are allowing their centres to become vaccine sites without failing to investigate that these COVID-19 vaccines are cell and gene therapy. They are guilty of nonfeasance.

Nonfeasance is the failure to do something that one is legally responsible to do. Nonfeasance is an intentional failure to live up to one’s legal or moral duty in a given situation, a refusal to fulfill one’s obligation.

To those who administer these cell and gene therapy experimemental jabs, did you fully investigate what these products are, what they do, if they provide immunity. If not, you have failed your duty and are guilty of nonfeasance.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

It is absolutely out of order that these leaders continue to push this vaccine agenda when it’s not a VACCINE. I put together this complaint letter to Amanda Pritchard, Chief Executive of NHS England. Her email is Feel free to make changes, but there is power in numbers. Children are next. The devil doesn’t care whom he maims and destroys. These children may be possibly sterilized as part of the evil depopulation agenda. Don’t let it happen. Fight back.

Amanda Pritchard Complaint Letter

1 Comment

  1. There is an ivermectin panic on the big tech and MSM right now. Massive articles from MSM on Ivermectin trying to push a danger narrative and also negative press on Americans Frontline Dr’s, again, to keep the Covid narrative alive. Just go to the Goog and type ivermectin then look at all the panic news articles. We are over the target. Big-Pharma is panicking. This medicine has been widely used by humans without any problems for 40 years. It’s inventor won a Nobel Prize after 20 years of successful use and after 100 million people were cured of a broad spectrum of problems without any side effects. Get your Ivermectin while you still can!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *